home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: korppi.cs.tut.fi!k125374
- From: k125374@korppi.cs.tut.fi (Mika Kortelainen)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
- Subject: Re: Proper mask, transfer rate, etc.
- Date: 15 Apr 1996 14:24:34 GMT
- Organization: Tampere University of Technology (CS)
- Distribution: inet
- Message-ID: <4ktm72$m0a@peippo.cs.tut.fi>
- References: <4k1740$ddo@hobbes.compusult.nf.ca> <4k1lkb$a3j@freenet-news.carleton.ca> <1658.6677T638T2771@iig.com.au> <dalec.06nm@zorro.amitrix.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: korppi.cs.tut.fi
- NNTP-Posting-User: k125374
- X-Newsreader: NN version 6.5.0 #1 (NOV)
-
- dalec@zorro.amitrix.com (Dale Currie) writes:
- >
- >Yes, it would be interesting to see some test numbers on large newer drives
- >to see if there is a difference at higher speed transfers.
-
- Should the value (ending with c, e, f) be put on Mask or MaxTransfer?
- I have a new 2 GB drive (Quantum Saturn) and according to DiskSpeed it
- reads a bit over eight megabytes per second (using 256KB blocks). I use
- 0xffffffff and 0x7fffffff (Mask and MaxTransfer or vice verse) but I could
- try other values, too.
-
- Oh, I have Warp Engine in my A3000, I guess the native SCSI controller
- is a bit slower...
-
- Mika Kortelainen
-